Blogs : WSI WHISTLE BLOWER PROTECTION
By:
What if the three WSI employees who are asking for "Whistle Blower" protection were not supposed to be rifling through Mark Armstrong’s office when they came across Mark’s personal journal? What if one of them was then the person that went to the State’s Attorney and helped to get the search warrant? Like maybe, James Long? Mark Armstrong has an unblemished ethical record. If all of you moonbats think that this journal is some type of smoking gun you will be, as in the case of all that has been thrown against Sandy Blunt, deeply disappointed. This whole thing has been partly an inside job by some current and some former WSI employees and numerous political types who think they can use all of this dishonesty for political advantage. The truth always outs and justice will prevail.
| Comments Posted: 7316 | |
| SCates | 16:31, October 24, 2007 |
| Thanks. Fixed now. | |
| Hey Scates | 13:34, October 24, 2007 |
| This is how you spell "whistle". Not the way you have it in the heading "wistle" | |
| Gay but not snoopy | 22:48, October 23, 2007 |
| The diary was no secret. Mark has a tendency to forget how loud he talks. | |
| Jim might be Gay | 21:30, October 23, 2007 |
| My favorite log cabin republican | |
| Jim's other gay lover | 19:08, October 23, 2007 |
| Let the character assassination begin. | |
| Jim's gay lover. | 19:07, October 23, 2007 |
| [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] . . [Next] . . [732] | |