Beacon Authors   ·   Beacon Blog   ·   Data   ·   Editorials   ·   Letters   ·   Media   ·   News   ·   Print Issue Archive

Blogs : WSI WHISTLE BLOWER PROTECTION

By:

What if the three WSI employees who are asking for "Whistle Blower" protection were not supposed to be rifling through Mark Armstrong’s office when they came across Mark’s personal journal? What if one of them was then the person that went to the State’s Attorney and helped to get the search warrant? Like maybe, James Long? Mark Armstrong has an unblemished ethical record. If all of you moonbats think that this journal is some type of smoking gun you will be, as in the case of all that has been thrown against Sandy Blunt, deeply disappointed. This whole thing has been partly an inside job by some current and some former WSI employees and numerous political types who think they can use all of this dishonesty for political advantage. The truth always outs and justice will prevail.

Comments Posted: 7357
Correction. 23:07, October 30, 2007
Mossback ideologue.
Your legacy 18:26, October 30, 2007
Mossback.
SCates 21:17, October 29, 2007
You detest spin?: Hint - BismarckDims
SCates 15:45, October 28, 2007
The Nudelanders know who they are.
You detest spin? 14:08, October 28, 2007
But you are not above name calling? If you are going to be so sophomoric, maybe you should use names people understand. Nudelanders? I've searched the world wide web, and no earthly being knows what that means. Love, Moonbat
SCates 12:56, October 28, 2007
Keeping up with all of the lies thrown about by the moonbat blunt haters and Nudelanders does take a little bit of time and effort.
Overtime? 11:44, October 27, 2007
Does Sandy pay you overtime? I see youa re posting at 1:59 AM. I bet you had a long week.
Where are the documents? 11:42, October 27, 2007
It is now Saturday morning. Where are the promised "secret" documents?
Where are the documents? 11:42, October 27, 2007
It is now Saturday morning. Where are the promised "secret" documents?
Are You Kidding? 09:43, October 27, 2007
You write, "So far none of the people that I have written about have chosen to take legal action about what I have written, nor have any of them so much as made a public comment concerning the validity of my assertions concerning them." That doesn't mean they are guilty. It just means 1) They are giving you enough rope to hang yourself with or 2) They have a smidgen of class.
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] . . [Next] . . [736]
Post Comments
Name:
Comment: