Blogs : HEITKAMP LIES ABOUT ALMOST EVERYTHING CONCERNING FCC VOICE-MAIL FINE!
By:
On January 25, 2006 Sandy Blunt called Joel Heitkamp’s cell phone. Joel had begun demagoging to the effect that employers were getting “kick-backs” from WSI. The facts of the matter had been completely presented to Heitkamp several times and had, in fact been clarified in a Fargo Forum article in November of 2005. Here is a portion (not the full message).
http://www.bismarckdems.com/av/sandy.mp3
Where in that message does Sandy Blunt threaten Joel Heitkamp’s job? Where does he threaten legal action? He simply states that he had been asked about defamation lawsuit, never asserting the he (Sandy) was going to initiate any action, nor that WSI would. By the way were is the end of the call? Where is the good-by or some other ending salutation? What this really is, is Blunt almost begging Heitkamp to tell the truth (and Heitkamp knew the truth). It must have been quite a threat in the mind of Heitkamp because it turns out that the portion of the call that Heitkamp omitted was that Sandy asked to be on Heitkamp’s show the next day. Sandy Blunt was interviewed on January 26, 2006 for about half an hour. On December 12 or 13 of 2006 (nearly 11 months latter) Heitkamp begins publicly claiming that Sandy Blunt had threatened to get him fired and as proof offered up an edited version of the voice-mail . An altered audio cut, eleven months latter, presented as contemporaneous. One has to question as to weather or not Joel Heitkamp is a liar when these facts are known.
On top of that, in a AP Fargo Forum article of July 10, 2008, Joel claims that the topic of the WSI Performance Audit was the reason for Sandy Blunt calling to threaten his job. The voice message was left in January of 2006, the audit would not even begin until February of 2006. Is Joel Heitkamp a liar? Please consider the results of the external studies by Marsh and Connley. There was no purposeful denial of WSI help to injured workers. There was no corruption at WSI. WSI was serving there clients (workers and employers) very well. As a matter of fact nothing that Joel Heitkamp claimed and demagouged about turns out to be true. Joel Heitkamp is a liar.
Joel – take me to court over defamation of you. Please!
| Comments Posted: 2 | |
| SCates | 12:14, July 13, 2008 |
| Chad Nodland never was eligible, he never contacted me to be included, he has not served me with any legal notice of compliance failure. If I owe him a bunch of money as he claims, I would think a first-rate, brilliant lawyer like him would hall me into court to collect $100,000 . He has not. Does that not seem at least somewhat odd? Even to turenob? Is it possible that Chad is afflicted with the same problem that Joel is? Extreme lack of veracity? | |
| truenob | 11:58, July 13, 2008 |
| we should wait to startwith joel heitkamp until steve cates get the hundred thousand he owes chad nodland paid, No sense piling up more debt until the old stuff is paid! | |