Blogs : WSI WHISTLE BLOWER PROTECTION
By:
What if the three WSI employees who are asking for "Whistle Blower" protection were not supposed to be rifling through Mark Armstrong’s office when they came across Mark’s personal journal? What if one of them was then the person that went to the State’s Attorney and helped to get the search warrant? Like maybe, James Long? Mark Armstrong has an unblemished ethical record. If all of you moonbats think that this journal is some type of smoking gun you will be, as in the case of all that has been thrown against Sandy Blunt, deeply disappointed. This whole thing has been partly an inside job by some current and some former WSI employees and numerous political types who think they can use all of this dishonesty for political advantage. The truth always outs and justice will prevail.
| Comments Posted: 7316 | |
| SCates | 01:59, October 27, 2007 |
| The documents had been disaggregated and put into notebooks under sections for each of the three charge issues. I have thousands of pages of documents. I could not remember exactly how many there were to begin with. When I found the first four pages I thought that was it. Then I found two more pages. I have written a notarized document attesting to the authenticity of the documents and that letter with copies of the original documents, have been delivered to members of the print and broadcast press, as well as the BCSA, BCI and NDHP. I had to make two trips to each office, delivering the first 4 pages and then the subsequent additional 2. You people always seem to forget that I have nothing to gain and everything to lose by not being truthful in this matter. I have written over 20,000 published words on this issue. I have submitted many comments on the Tribune reader blog. All of that can be researched on the web. So far none of the people that I have written about have chosen to take legal action about what I have written, nor have any of them so much as made a public comment concerning the validity of my assertions concerning them. Perhaps there is a reason for this. Am I busy earning a living and trying to get the truth of this matter out? Do I make mistakes? Yes, on both counts but I have never purposely attempted to mislead. That is such a liberal thing. I try to avoid doing the types of things characteristic of the American political left. They seem to operate in my opinion with out regard for truth in any form. I find that reprehensible. So I try to avoid it. It is so easy in the modern digital world to be found out when thousands of eyes are on your work and Google makes analysis so much easier than ever before. That is the reason you liberal socialists get the snot kicked out of you as a matter of course, day in and day out. Thanks by the way, for providing so very much entertainment as that kicking progresses. | |
| Beleiver. | 20:51, October 26, 2007 |
| I don't doubt you. After all, someone like you that is so adept at character assassination would never tell a fib. How about an answer to the question "is that the same envelope that was "anomalously" delivered to you before your infamous May "workforce safey and insurance" stories?" | |
| Secret document watcher | 19:29, October 26, 2007 |
| You posted a lengthy description of the secret documents in the Bismarck Tribune blogs. You said that it was 4 pages and it would be posted right away. Now it's 2 pages. Where are the secret documents? | |
| SCates | 17:55, October 26, 2007 |
| Had some technical problems (daughter's computer that has scanner software on fritz) and I overlooked 2 pages in amongst my WSI files. Images will be online by Saturday morning. | |
| Takes time? | 07:01, October 26, 2007 |
| To create fake secret documents? | |
| Make that... | 22:37, October 25, 2007 |
| an hour and a half. | |
| Empty promise? | 21:32, October 25, 2007 |
| I thought you were going to unveil Blunt's secret documents that Kris Kringle delivered to the press. By the way, is that the same envelope that was "anomalously" delivered to you before your infamous May "workforce safey and insurance" stories? My clock says you have 2 & 1/2 hours. | |
| SCates | 22:18, October 24, 2007 |
| I have changed nothing. Please but down and back away from your bong! | |
| Why remove truth about Mark | 19:44, October 24, 2007 |
| SCates, why did you remove the truth about Mark Armstrong. You state he has an unblemished ethical record, we point out otherwise and you silence it. I guess its your site, you can do what you want, but it still doesn't mean it isn't true | |
| Are you for real | 18:48, October 24, 2007 |
| Marks ethical record is not unblemished. He was supsended in 2005 for abuse of state property to play a April fools joke, and was required to pay one months cell phone bill (which he didn't pay until the auditors discovered it). He was then again reprimanded for using WSI property for his campaign for Burleigh Count commissioner. | |
| [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] . . [Next] . . [732] | |