Blogs : WSI WHISTLE BLOWER PROTECTION
By:
What if the three WSI employees who are asking for "Whistle Blower" protection were not supposed to be rifling through Mark Armstrong’s office when they came across Mark’s personal journal? What if one of them was then the person that went to the State’s Attorney and helped to get the search warrant? Like maybe, James Long? Mark Armstrong has an unblemished ethical record. If all of you moonbats think that this journal is some type of smoking gun you will be, as in the case of all that has been thrown against Sandy Blunt, deeply disappointed. This whole thing has been partly an inside job by some current and some former WSI employees and numerous political types who think they can use all of this dishonesty for political advantage. The truth always outs and justice will prevail.
| Comments Posted: 7354 | |
| SCates | 15:45, October 28, 2007 |
| The Nudelanders know who they are. | |
| You detest spin? | 14:08, October 28, 2007 |
| But you are not above name calling? If you are going to be so sophomoric, maybe you should use names people understand. Nudelanders? I've searched the world wide web, and no earthly being knows what that means. Love, Moonbat | |
| SCates | 12:56, October 28, 2007 |
| Keeping up with all of the lies thrown about by the moonbat blunt haters and Nudelanders does take a little bit of time and effort. | |
| Overtime? | 11:44, October 27, 2007 |
| Does Sandy pay you overtime? I see youa re posting at 1:59 AM. I bet you had a long week. | |
| Where are the documents? | 11:42, October 27, 2007 |
| It is now Saturday morning. Where are the promised "secret" documents? | |
| Where are the documents? | 11:42, October 27, 2007 |
| It is now Saturday morning. Where are the promised "secret" documents? | |
| Are You Kidding? | 09:43, October 27, 2007 |
| You write, "So far none of the people that I have written about have chosen to take legal action about what I have written, nor have any of them so much as made a public comment concerning the validity of my assertions concerning them." That doesn't mean they are guilty. It just means 1) They are giving you enough rope to hang yourself with or 2) They have a smidgen of class. | |
| Now we know. | 09:23, October 27, 2007 |
| So Sandy Cates is admitting being paid for this work. "Am I busy earning a living and trying to get the truth of this matter out?" Ever since The Journal came out I can't get the picture of you as a marionette and SBlunt making you dance out of my head. How much are you being paid? | |
| SCates | 01:59, October 27, 2007 |
| The documents had been disaggregated and put into notebooks under sections for each of the three charge issues. I have thousands of pages of documents. I could not remember exactly how many there were to begin with. When I found the first four pages I thought that was it. Then I found two more pages. I have written a notarized document attesting to the authenticity of the documents and that letter with copies of the original documents, have been delivered to members of the print and broadcast press, as well as the BCSA, BCI and NDHP. I had to make two trips to each office, delivering the first 4 pages and then the subsequent additional 2. You people always seem to forget that I have nothing to gain and everything to lose by not being truthful in this matter. I have written over 20,000 published words on this issue. I have submitted many comments on the Tribune reader blog. All of that can be researched on the web. So far none of the people that I have written about have chosen to take legal action about what I have written, nor have any of them so much as made a public comment concerning the validity of my assertions concerning them. Perhaps there is a reason for this. Am I busy earning a living and trying to get the truth of this matter out? Do I make mistakes? Yes, on both counts but I have never purposely attempted to mislead. That is such a liberal thing. I try to avoid doing the types of things characteristic of the American political left. They seem to operate in my opinion with out regard for truth in any form. I find that reprehensible. So I try to avoid it. It is so easy in the modern digital world to be found out when thousands of eyes are on your work and Google makes analysis so much easier than ever before. That is the reason you liberal socialists get the snot kicked out of you as a matter of course, day in and day out. Thanks by the way, for providing so very much entertainment as that kicking progresses. | |
| Beleiver. | 20:51, October 26, 2007 |
| I don't doubt you. After all, someone like you that is so adept at character assassination would never tell a fib. How about an answer to the question "is that the same envelope that was "anomalously" delivered to you before your infamous May "workforce safey and insurance" stories?" | |
| [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] . . [Next] . . [736] | |